My "idea" is—to
become a Rothschild. I invite the reader to keep calm and not to excite
himself.
I repeat it. My
"idea" is to become a Rothschild, to become as rich as Rothschild,
not simply rich, but as rich as Rothschild. What objects I have in view, what
for, and why—all that shall come later. First I will simply show that the
attainment of my object is a mathematical certainty.
It is a very simple
matter; the whole secret lies in two words: OBSTINACY and PERSEVERANCE.
……………………………………………………………….
I've still to answer the
questions, "What for?" and "Why?" Whether it's moral,"
and all the rest of it. I've undertaken to answer them.
I am sad at
disappointing the reader straight off, sad and glad too. Let him know that in
my idea there is absolutely no feeling of "revenge," nothing
"Byronic"—no curses, no lamentations over my orphaned state, no tears
over my illegitimacy, nothing, nothing of the sort. In fact, if a romantic lady
should chance to come across my autobiography she would certainly turn up her
nose. The whole object of my "idea" is—isolation. But one can arrive
at isolation without straining to become a Rothschild. What has Rothschild got
to do with it?
Why, this. That besides
isolation I want power.
Let me tell the reader,
he will perhaps be horrified at the candour of my confession, and in the
simplicity of his heart will wonder how the author could help blushing: but my
answer is that I'm not writing for publication, and I may not have a reader for
ten years, and by that time everything will be so thoroughly past, settled and
defined that there will be no need to blush. And so, if I sometimes in my
autobiography appeal to my reader it is simply a form of expression. My reader
is an imaginary figure.
No, it was not being
illegitimate, with which I was so taunted at Touchard's, not my sorrowful
childhood, it was not revenge, nor the desire to protest, that was at the
bottom of my idea; my character alone was responsible for everything. At twelve
years old, I believe, that is almost at the dawn of real consciousness, I began
to dislike my fellow-creatures. It was not that I disliked them exactly, but
that their presence weighed upon me. I was sometimes in my moments of purest
sincerity quite sad that I never could express everything even to my nearest
and dearest, that is, I could but will not; for some reason I restrain myself,
so that I'm mistrustful, sullen and reserved. Again, I have noticed one
characteristic in myself almost from childhood, that I am too ready to find
fault, and given to blaming others. But this impulse was often followed at once
by another which was very irksome to me: I would ask myself whether it were not
my fault rather than theirs. And how often I blamed myself for nothing! To avoid
such doubts I naturally sought solitude. Besides, I found nothing in the
company of others, however much I tried, and I did try. All the boys of my own
age anyway, all my schoolfellows, all, every one of them, turned out to be
inferior to me in their ideas. I don't recall one single exception.
Yes, I am a gloomy
person; I'm always shutting myself up. I often love to walk out of a room full
of people. I may perhaps do people a kindness, but often I cannot see the
slightest reason for doing them a kindness. People are not such splendid
creatures that they are worth taking much trouble about. Why can't they
approach me openly and directly, why must I always be forced to make the first
overtures?
That is the question I
asked myself. I am a grateful creature, and have shown it by a hundred
imbecilities. If some one were frank with me, I should instantly respond with
frankness and begin to love them at once. And so I have done, but they have all
deceived me promptly, and have withdrawn from me with a sneer. The most candid
of them all was Lambert, who beat me so much as a child, but he was only an
open brute and scoundrel. And even his openness was only stupidity. Such was my
state of mind when I came to Petersburg.
When I came out from
Dergatchev's (and goodness only knows what made me go to him) I had gone up to
Vassin, and in a rush of enthusiasm I had begun singing his praises. And that
very evening I felt that I liked him much less. Why? Just because by my praise
of him I had demeaned myself before him. Yet one might have thought it would
have been the other way: a man just and generous enough to give another his
due, even to his own detriment, ought to stand higher in personal dignity than
anyone. And though I quite understood this, I did like Vassin less, much less
in fact. I purposely choose an example with which the reader is familiar. I
even thought of Kraft with a bitter, sickly feeling, because he had led me into
the passage, and this feeling lasted till the day when Kraft's state of mind at
the time was revealed, and it was impossible to be angry with him. From the
time when I was in the lowest class in the grammar-school, as soon as any of my
comrades excelled me in school work, or witty answers or physical strength, I
immediately gave up talking or having anything to do with them. Not that I
disliked them or wished them not to succeed; I simply turned away from them
because such was my character.
Yes, I thirsted for
power, I've thirsted for it all my life, power and solitude. I dreamed of it at
an age when every one would have laughed at me to my face if they could have
guessed what was in my head. That was why I so liked secrecy. And indeed all my
energy went into dreams, so much so that I had no time to talk. This led to my
being unsociable, and my absentmindedness led people to more unpleasant
conclusions about me, but my rosy cheeks belied their suspicions.
I was particularly happy
when, covering myself up in bed at night, I began in complete solitude, with no
stir or sound of other people round me, to re-create life on a different plan.
I was most desperately dreamy up to the time of the "idea," when all
my dreams became rational instead of foolish, and passed from the fantastic
realms of romance to the reasonable world of reality.
Everything was concentrated
into one object. Not that they were so very stupid before, although there were
masses and masses of them. But I had favourites … there is no need to
bring them in here, however.
Power! I am convinced
that very many people would think it very funny if they knew that such a
"pitiful" creature was struggling for power. But I shall surprise
them even more: perhaps from my very first dreams that is, almost from my
earliest childhood, I could never imagine myself except in the foremost place,
always and in every situation in life. I will add a strange confession: it is
the same perhaps to this day. At the same time, let me observe that I am not
apologizing for it.
That is the point of my
idea, that is the force of it, that money is the one means by which the
humblest nonentity may rise to the FOREMOST PLACE. I may not be a nonentity,
but I know from the looking-glass that my exterior does not do me justice, for
my face is commonplace. But if I were as rich as Rothschild, who would find
fault with my face? And wouldn't thousands of women be ready to fly to me with
all their charms if I whistled to them? I am sure that they would honestly
consider me good-looking. Suppose I am clever. But were I as wise as Solomon
some one would be found wiser still, and I should be done for. But if I were a
Rothschild what would that wise man be beside me? Why, they would not let him
say a word beside me! I may be witty, but with Talleyrand or Piron I'm thrown
into the shade; but if I were Rothschild, where would Piron be, and where
Talleyrand even, perhaps? Money is, of course, despotic power, and at the same
time it is the greatest leveller, and that is its chief power. Money levels all
inequality. I settled all that in Moscow.
You will see, of course,
in this idea nothing but insolence, violence, the triumph of the nonentity over
the talented. I admit that it is an impudent idea (and for that reason a sweet
one). But let it pass: you imagine that I desire power to be able to crush, to
avenge myself. That is just the point, that that is how the commonplace would
behave. What is more, I'm convinced that thousands of the wise and talented who
are so exalted, if the Rothschilds' millions suddenly fell to their lot could
not resist behaving like the most vulgar and commonplace, and would be more
oppressive than any. My idea is quite different. I'm not afraid of money. It
won't crush me and it won't make me crush others.
What I want isn't money,
or rather money is not necessary to me, nor power either. I only want what is
obtained by power, and cannot be obtained without it; that is, the calm and
solitary consciousness of strength! That is the fullest definition of liberty
for which the whole world is struggling! Liberty! At last I have written that
grand word… . Yes, the solitary consciousness of strength is splendid and
alluring. I have strength and I am serene. With the thunderbolts in his hands
Jove is serene; are his thunders often heard? The fool fancies that he is
asleep. But put a literary man or a peasant-woman in Jove's place, and the
thunder would never cease!
If I only have power, I
argued, I should have no need to use it. I assure you that of my own free will
I should take the lowest seat everywhere. If I were a Rothschild, I would go
about in an old overcoat with an umbrella. What should I care if I were jostled
in the crowd, if I had to skip through the mud to avoid being run over? The
consciousness that I was myself, a Rothschild, would even amuse me at the
moment. I should know I could have a dinner better than anyone, that I could
have the best cook in the world, it would be enough for me to know it. I would
eat a piece of bread and ham and be satisfied with the consciousness of it. I
think so even now.
I shouldn't run after
the aristocracy, but they would run after me. I shouldn't pursue women, but
they would fly to me like the wind, offering me all that women can offer.
"The vulgar" run after money, but the intelligent are attracted by
curiosity to the strange, proud and reserved being, indifferent to everything.
I would be kind, and would give them money perhaps, but I would take nothing
from them. Curiosity arouses passion, perhaps I may inspire passion. They will
take nothing away with them I assure you, except perhaps presents that will
make me twice as interesting to them.
Dostoyevsky, The Adolescent (1875), translated by Constance Garnett
Dostoyevsky, The Adolescent (1875), translated by Constance Garnett

